FIDERA LAW
Canadian immigration law

Become CanadianRevocation

Become Canadian · Revocation

One ground only, and a court decides by default.

Citizenship can be revoked for fraud, false representation or knowingly concealing material circumstances, and for nothing else. The security grounds that once existed were repealed in 2017. The Federal Court is the default decision maker, the sixty days after the notice are where the case is made, and where the Minister decides instead the only recourse is judicial review, with leave, within thirty days.

One ground, and a court as the default

Revocation is narrower than its reputation and better protected than most people assume. There is a single ground, and the Federal Court decides unless you choose otherwise.

Verified 19 August 2026

Sixty days, and what you put in them matters

The notice you receive sets out the grounds and the material relied on, and it starts a sixty day period, running from the day the notice was sent, in which to make written representations. That period is extendable for special reasons, and the Minister must consider what you file.

Those representations are also where personal circumstances, the best interests of any child directly affected, and the risk of statelessness are raised. They are not a formality, because the Minister must refer the matter to the Court unless satisfied there was no fraud or that special relief is warranted.

Citizenship Act sections 22.1 and 10.7 · verified 19 August 2026

If you ask the Minister to decide, the challenge window is thirty days

Where you ask the Minister to decide rather than letting the matter go to the Federal Court, the only recourse against the outcome is judicial review, and it needs leave of the Court. The application must be filed in the Registry and served on the other party within thirty days after the day you are notified of the matter or otherwise become aware of it. That period is half the length of the representation window and it is easy to lose while waiting to see what happens next.

Appeal rights are narrow too. An appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal from a judgment under section 10.1 or 10.5 lies only where the judge, in rendering judgment, certifies that a serious question of general importance is involved and states the question.

  • The only ground is fraud. False representation, fraud, or knowingly concealing material circumstances, in obtaining, retaining, renouncing or resuming citizenship. It reaches a case where permanent residence was obtained by fraud and citizenship followed.
  • Revocation does not usually leave you a foreign national. Where the fraud was in the citizenship process only, you revert to permanent resident status and the department's position is that revocation in that situation does not remove your right to remain in Canada. You become a foreign national only where the ground is that permanent residence itself was obtained by false representation.
  • The national security grounds were repealed in 2017. Citizenship cannot be revoked for a terrorism or treason conviction, whatever you may read. That repeal did not touch the prohibitions on a grant, so the same facts can still bar a permanent resident from being granted citizenship, and some of those bars have no time limit.
  • The Federal Court decides by default. The Minister must bring an action and obtain a declaration, unless you ask the Minister to decide instead.
  • A request for information usually comes first, with thirty days. Before the formal notice that starts the sixty day period.
  • Judicial review is the recourse from a Ministerial decision, with thirty days and leave. Filed and served within thirty days of being notified or becoming aware, and only with leave of the Court. An appeal onward needs a certified serious question of general importance.
  • A revocation carries a ten year bar on a fresh grant, and closes resumption for good. A person subject to a revocation decision or declaration cannot resume citizenship at all, with no time limit, so the route back is permanent residence and then a grant once the ten years have run. Renunciation applications are also not accepted while proceedings are under way.
  • The most serious cases can end in a deportation order made by the Court. Where an inadmissibility declaration is sought in the same action, that declaration is itself a deportation order in force when made, with no admissibility hearing and no appeal from an interlocutory judgment.

What we look at before a citizenship file goes in

Whether you are already a citizen, because since December 2025 a great many people are and do not know it. Whether your days actually add up, since the presence rule counts some time at half and excludes some altogether. And whether anything in your record engages a prohibition, because those stop an application that otherwise qualifies.

01 / Start here

Strategy consultation

A paid session that tests your record against this route and the alternatives, checks how your work is classified, and tells you plainly where you actually stand.

02 / Review

Lawyer review, you file

You prepare and submit; we review the classification, the evidence and the documentation before it goes in, and flag what would be questioned.

03 / Representation

Full representation

We build, document and file the matter as your lawyer of record, and carry it through to the federal permanent residence stage.

Every matter begins with the strategy consultation. If you instruct us within six months of that consultation for a lawyer review or for full representation, the consultation fee is credited against that work. One credit per person.

Frequently asked questions

On what grounds can citizenship be revoked?

One, and only one, in current law. Citizenship can be revoked where it was obtained, retained, renounced or resumed by false representation, by fraud, or by knowingly concealing material circumstances. That extends to a case where permanent residence itself was obtained by fraud and citizenship followed from it.

Can citizenship be revoked for terrorism or treason?

No, and this is widely misreported. Grounds of that kind existed briefly and were repealed in June 2017. A citizen convicted of a serious offence faces the criminal law like any other citizen, and does not face revocation on that basis. Do not read that as making those facts irrelevant across the board. The repeal removed a revocation ground and left the prohibitions on a grant untouched, so a permanent resident who is not yet a citizen can still be barred from being granted citizenship, permanently and with no time limit, on convictions of that kind. Only one of the prohibitions, section 22(1)(g), was repealed in 2017, and the permanent bars were amended as recently as 2024.

Who decides?

The Federal Court, by default. The Minister must bring an action and obtain a declaration from the Court unless you ask the Minister to decide instead. So a right to a judicial determination is the starting position rather than something you have to fight for.

What does the process look like?

It usually opens with a request for information, with thirty days to respond. Then a formal notice setting out the specific grounds and the material relied on, and telling you that the matter goes to the Court unless you ask the Minister to decide. You then have sixty days from the day the notice was sent to make written representations, extendable for special reasons, and the Minister must consider them before deciding anything.

What can I put in those representations?

Your personal circumstances, the best interests of any child directly affected, and whether a decision would leave you stateless. The Minister must refer the matter to the Court unless satisfied there was no fraud, or that special relief is warranted, or you have asked for a Ministerial decision.

If the Minister decides against me, how do I challenge it?

By judicial review in the Federal Court, and the deadline is short. Judicial review of any matter under the Citizenship Act can be brought only with leave of the Court, and the application must be filed in the Registry and served on the other party within thirty days after the day you are notified of the matter or otherwise become aware of it. Thirty days, not sixty, and leave is a separate hurdle before the merits are reached. This is the recourse that goes with asking the Minister to decide, which is why that choice deserves thought at the sixty day stage rather than afterwards.

Can a Federal Court judgment be appealed?

Only on a certified question. An appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal from a judgment under section 10.1 or 10.5 can be made only if the judge, in rendering judgment, certifies that a serious question of general importance is involved and states the question. Without that certification the judgment is the end of the road.

What happens if citizenship is revoked?

It depends on what the fraud was in, and the difference is the whole point. Where the false representation, fraud or concealment occurred during the citizenship process only, for instance misrepresenting residence or physical presence in Canada for the citizenship period, the person becomes a permanent resident again. The department's own position is that revocation in that situation does not remove the right of the person to remain in Canada. Where the grounds are that the person became a permanent resident by false representation, so the fraud was upstream of the citizenship, the person becomes a foreign national. Either way a ten year bar applies to being granted citizenship again, and a person subject to a revocation decision or declaration is barred from resuming permanently, so the route back is a fresh grant after the ten years rather than resumption. In the most serious cases the Minister of Public Safety can ask the Court, in the same action, for a declaration of inadmissibility on security, human or international rights, or organised criminality grounds. Such a declaration is itself a deportation order, in force when it is made, with no admissibility hearing, and there is no appeal from an interlocutory judgment on it.